إنســـانيــات .. نحـو عـلم اجـتماعى نـقدى خطوة على طريق الوعي |
|
| الموسوعة الكبرى لحقوق الإنسان: أكثر من 100 كتاب ودراسة أجنبية حديثة - تابعونا - | |
|
+14Aty younes ضياء الدين بو مرعي MOUMEN6666 رشا محمد احمد basoohdo لميا خيرى justice_gov منذر محسن قمر الليالي ايهاب الضبع nora mahdjour wafaa fofo amena د. فرغلى هارون 18 مشترك | |
كاتب الموضوع | رسالة |
---|
د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: الموسوعة الكبرى لحقوق الإنسان: أكثر من 100 كتاب ودراسة أجنبية حديثة - تابعونا - 20/2/2010, 3:34 pm | |
|
عدل سابقا من قبل algohiny في 17/3/2010, 4:19 pm عدل 3 مرات | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Defining the Relationship between Corruption and Human Rights 20/2/2010, 3:42 pm | |
| | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Land, Law and Islam: Property and Human Rights in the Muslim World 20/2/2010, 3:48 pm | |
|
Land, Law and Islam: Property and Human Rights in the Muslim World Siraj Sait, Hilary Lim Zed Books 2006 288 pages 1.91 MB In this pioneering work, Siraj Sait and Hilary Lim address Islamic property and land rights drawing on a range of socio-historical, classical and contemporary debates and their practice. They address the significance of Islamic theories of property and Islamic land tenure regimes on the "webs of tenure" prevalent in the Muslim societies. They consider the possibilities with Islamic legal and human rights systems for the development of inclusive, pro-poor and innovative approaches to land rights. They also focus on Muslim women's rights to property and inheritance systems. Engaging with institutions such as the Islamic endowment (waqf) and principles of Islamic microfinance, they test the workability of "authentic" Islamic proposals. Located in human rights as well as Islamic debates, this study offers a well researched and constructive appraisal of property and land rights in the Muslim world.أدع لنا بالخير حتى يظهر لك الرابط Or Or
عدل سابقا من قبل algohiny في 20/2/2010, 4:17 pm عدل 1 مرات | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Corruption and Human Rights: Making the Connection 20/2/2010, 3:56 pm | |
|
Corruption and Human Rights: Making the Connection ICHRP International Council on Human Rights Policy International Council on Human Rights Policy (ICHRP) Geneva, Switzerland, 2009
Abstract: In recent years, governments and international organisations have taken many initiatives to reduce corruption. However, the issue has rarely been analysed from the point of view of human rights. Therefore, in 2007 the Council commenced a project focused on the connection between corruption and human rights. The project aims to assist organisations that prosecute or support anti-corruption policies to apply human rights effectively to strengthen their programmes; to make human rights bodies and mechanisms more accessible to those who work to end corruption; and to make anti-corruption methods and practices more accessible to human rights advocates. This report, Corruption and Human Rights: Making the Connection, develops a conceptual framework enabling users to describe, in specific terms, how violations of human rights may be linked to particular acts of corruption. It sets out why those working on corruption and those working on human rights have reasons to cooperate, and delineates the main features of the two traditions of practice. It also builds links between specific acts of corruption and specific violations of rights – recognising that the links are sometimes indirect and that in some cases corruption may not violate human rights, strictly understood. Using a conceptual framework for assessing when particular acts of corruption violate human rights, this report shows how organisations can promote human rights while working to end corruption. أدع لنا بالخير حتى يظهر لك الرابط | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| | | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Human Rights in Crisis: Is There No Answer to Human Violence? 23/2/2010, 1:11 pm | |
|
Human Rights in Crisis: Is There No Answer to Human Violence? Author Stork, Peter Robert Institution Australian Catholic University 2006
Abstract The study attempts to bring together the mimetic theory of René Girard and the theology of Raymund Schwager to address questions inherent in the contemporary notion of human rights. The impetus derives from the phenomenon of human violence, the universal presence of which points to a problematic that seems to defy conventional explanations and political solutions. In dialogue with Girard and Schwager, the project seeks to shed light on the causes not only of the apparent fragility of the human rights system, but also of the persistence with which large-scale human rights violations recur despite the proliferation of human rights norms. It argues that the human rights crisis is neither an accident nor a shortfall in techniques of implementation, but reflects the subconscious and collective structure of civilization. Following a description of the crisis, this investigation examines the nature of human violence, especially the contagious manner in which it works at the root of the crisis, offering understanding where conventional anthropological reflections fall short. The study argues with Girard that vengeance and retribution resonate deeply with the human psyche and easily evoke an archaic image of the divine. While this arouses moral protest in the post-modern mind, we meet here one of the fundamental issues mimetic theory elucidates, namely that it is on account of such an unconscious image of the “sacred” that vengeful violence has remained for so long a determining element in human history. In a theological key, the study presents human mimesis as a divinely constituted structure that makes possible divine/human intimacy and reciprocity. However, this exalted capacity is perverted. Human sin casts God into the image of an envious rival which corrupts the personal and structural dimensions of human sociality of which the so-called “human rights crisis” is but a contemporary manifestation. What rules the social order is not the true image of God but a resentful human projection that deceptively demands victims in exchange for peace and security. Thus “mimetic victimage” is the essential clue to the fallenness of nations and their institutions, including the institution of human rights, as well as to the fallenness of individuals in their profound alienation from God, from themselves and from one another. Nonetheless, mimesis is also a structure of hope and transcendent longing. So understood, it opens the way to a profound and practical appropriation of the meaning of Christ as the restoration of the image of God in humanity whereby rivalistic resentment, the epicenter of the human predicament, is undone through forgiveness. While there is an enabling aspect to violence when it restrains and coerces us for our benefit as we rightly fear the greater violence that might ensue in its absence, the study also argues that because mimetic human agents carry out the “deed of the law”, the human rights system cannot overcome the mimetic impulse. As a judicial system, human rights belong structurally to the same order as the system they seek to correct. This ambiguity takes on special significance in the “age of annihilation”. For the first time in history limitless violence has become feasible through weapons capable of planetary destruction so that humanity not only faces its own complicity with violence, but also the relative powerlessness of the human rights project to keep its mimetic escalation in check. This raises the central question of the study. If the institution of human rights cannot offer a rigorous critique of structural violence, let alone free humanity from complicity with it, where shall the world place its hope for a more humane future? It concludes that such a hope is not to be found in the proliferation of rights norms and their enforcement but in the transformation of human desire through the restoration of the true image of God as revealed in the Christ-event. This revelation judges as futile all attempts at human sociality that retain violence as their hidden core. Thus God’s freedom granting action in history is both revelatory and “political”: in its prophetic stance against the powers of human sin and domination, it calls humanity to its true vocation to be the image of God grounded in a new pacific mimesis that resonates freely and unflinchingly with the self-giving love of God in Christ. أدع لنا بالخير حتى يظهر لك الرابط
| |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Educating for Human Rights and Global Citizenship 23/2/2010, 1:15 pm | |
|
Educating for Human Rights and Global Citizenship Ali A. Abdi, Lynette Shultz State University of New York Press 2008 266 pages 5,1 MB Nearly sixty years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in spite of progress on some fronts, we are in many cases as far away as ever from achieving an inclusive citizenship and human rights for all. While human rights violations continue to affect millions across the world, there are also ongoing contestations regarding citizenship. In response to these and related issues, the contributors to this book critique both historical and current practices and suggest several pragmatic options, highlighting the role of education in attaining these noble yet unachieved objectives. This book represents a welcome addition to the human rights and global citizenship literature and provides ideas for new platforms that are human rights friendly and expansively attuned toward global citizenship.أدع لنا بالخير حتى يظهر لك الرابط
| |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: A Dialogical Approach to Human Rights: Institutions, Culture and Legitimacy 1/3/2010, 11:36 pm | |
| | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations 1/3/2010, 11:43 pm | |
|
Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations Robert F. Gorman The Scarecrow Press, Inc. 2007 488 pages 3,3 MB A unique one-stop source for vital information on the background and history of human rights theory and practice in the international arena, the "Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations" provides extensive background on the creation and ideals of these important organizations. The authors begin their study by giving a chronology of important events in the history of human rights and introducing their readers to the ancient Hebrew and Roman philosophies that inspired the beginnings of these protective organizations. Alphabetical entries give brief synopses of each organization and list treaties, founding members, related organizations, and addresses. Also included are entries describing pertinent human rights terminology, treaties, and individuals who have played important roles in the development of international human rights. With bibliography, lists of acronyms and abbreviations, and appendixes containing full listings of many international human rights documents. Essential for all law, sociology, international relations, or policy study collections. أدع لنا بالخير حتى يظهر لك الرابط Or
| |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: The law of peoples, human rights and minority rights: a study of legitimacy and international justice 1/3/2010, 11:49 pm | |
|
The law of peoples, human rights and minority rights a study of legitimacy and international justice
Vaca Paniagua, Moises Thesis (Master, Philosophy) Queen's University, 2007 AbstractSevere poverty and ethnic-conflicts are the two most devastating problems of the contemporary world. Eighteen million persons die every year from causes related to poverty and a vast amount of developing countries suffer from tremendous processes of destabilization –frequently involving highly violent actions– associated to the relations between majority and minority groups. In both cases, the intervention of international powers and institutions has not been helpful enough to make a difference, and this present reality projects itself as a distressing scene for the future. Human rights and minority rights are the most powerful international tools in trying to change this sad global scenario. However, there is an extensive debate on the nature of these rights in a theory of international justice. This is often characterized as a debate between “minimalist” who seek to reduce the currently –recognized list of human rights to a bare minimum in order to accommodate non-liberal societies, and more expansive liberal approaches, which seek to expand the list of human rights to include the full set of civil and political rights characteristic of modern liberal-democracies. In this thesis, I will argue in favour of a third position. In line with some of the more minimalist approaches, I will argue that constraints of legitimacy rule out attempts to include full civil and political rights into our list of human rights. However, I will argue that these same constraints of legitimacy advocates for expanding the currently-recognized list of human rights in at least two key respects: the recognition of certain basic social and economic rights; and the recognition of certain minority rights. In short, we should be minimalist on some issues, while more expansive in others. In developing this argument, I will relay on the framework provided by The Law of Peoples of John Rawls. أدع لنا بالخير حتى يظهر لك الرابط | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| | | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Who Benefits? The Effects of Foreign Aid and Foreign Direct Investment on Human Rights 1/3/2010, 11:59 pm | |
| | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| | | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| | | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Human Rights and Structural Adjustment 4/3/2010, 9:56 pm | |
|
Human Rights and Structural Adjustment M. Rodwan Abouharb, David Cingranelli Cambridge University Press 2008 290 pages 1 MB 'Structural adjustment' has been a central part of the development strategy for the 'third world'. Loans made by the World Bank and the IMF have been conditional on developing countries pursuing rapid economic liberalization programmes as it was believed this would strengthen their economies in the long run. M. Rodwan Abouharb and David Cingranelli argue that, conversely, structural adjustment agreements usually cause increased hardship for the poor, greater civil conflict, and more repression of human rights, therefore resulting in a lower rate of economic development. Greater exposure to structural adjustment has increased the prevalence of anti-government protests, riots and rebellion. It has led to less respect for economic and social rights, physical integrity rights, and worker rights, but more respect for democratic rights. Based on these findings, the authors recommend a human rights-based approach to economic development. | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Protecting Human Rights in a Democracy: What Role for the Courts? 4/3/2010, 10:00 pm | |
|
Protecting Human Rights in a Democracy What Role for the Courts?
Michael J. Perry Emory University School of Law; University of San Diego - School of Law and Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies (2009-2012) Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 38 Abstract: A growing number of democracies have empowered their judiciaries to enforce constitutional norms, many of the most important of which are human rights norms that, as articulated, serve principally to limit the power of government. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996) provides a recent important example of such judicial empowerment. This "global expansion of judicial power" - which has been called "one of the most significant trends in late-twentieth and early twenty-first-century government" - has led, in the view of some commentators, to "the judicialization of politics". Some prominent legal scholars - most notably, Mark Tushnet and Jeremy Waldron - have recently argued that such government by judiciary, especially American-style judicial review, subverts the democratic ideal of government by the people and is therefore deeply problematic. Less prosaically, the claim is that government by a politically independent judiciary subverts the democratic ideal of government by the politically dependent, because electorally accountable, representatives of the people. The question is more broadly relevant than ever, therefore, whether it is appropriate for the citizens of a liberal democracy to cede to their courts the power to oppose, in the name of one or more entrenched human rights norms, choices made by, or actions of, electorally accountable government officials. In pursing this inquiry, two other, related questions inevitably emerge: If some power to protect entrenched human rights should be ceded to the courts, how great ought that power to be in relation to the power of the other, electorally accountable parts of government? And in exercising the power ceded to them - a power to pass judgment on the choices and actions of electorally accountable government officials - should the courts defer as much as possible to those offificials, or to some of them; or, instead, should the courts abjure such deference?
| |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Globalization And Human Rights 4/3/2010, 10:10 pm | |
|
Globalization And Human Rights Alma Kadragic Chelsea House Publications 2005 132 Pages 1.3 MB these books are meant to help youth understand, discuss, and find answers to questions raised by globalization. Yet the introduction to the series claims the books are for lay people. Young adults might find the material somewhat advanced: In this book, the interrelationship between globalization and human rights is examined. Whether or not globalization is responsible for human rights violations, it is asked to eradicate them. At the end of World War II, the United Nations codified a guarantee for international human rights. The document essentially adopted the U.S. Bill of Rights and added economic, social, and cultural mandates. Enforcement has taken various forms: exposure, shaming, diplomacy, protest, and military intervention. Some believe a long-term solution to international abuses is the economic development of countries through free-trade agreements and outsourcing. Others claim this profit-driven solution actually encourages inhumane treatment of workers, especially women and children. Many advocacy non-governmental organizations work to improve human rights globally by using the media and the Internet to inform and influence the public, which can then open a political dialog toward reform. The book looks at many faces, from a new "zippy" Indian call-center worker to an Indian child begging on the street. Photos, an appendix of human rights organizations, a glossary, notes, a bibliography, and an index complete this important discussion. There are copyediting errors. 2006, Chelsea HousePublishers, Ages 15 up. | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Human Rights as Morality, Human Rights as Law 4/3/2010, 10:17 pm | |
|
Human Rights as Morality, Human Rights as Law Michael J. Perry Emory University School of Law; University of San Diego - School of Law and Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies (2009-2012) September 27, 2008 Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 08-45 San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-079
Abstract: There has been growing interest in, and scholarly attention to, issues and questions that arise within the subject matter domain we may call "human rights theory". See, in particular, Amartya Sen, "Elements of a Theory of Human Rights," 32 Philosophy & Public Affairs 315 (2004); James W. Nickel, Making Sense of Human Rights (rev. ed. 2006); Michael J. Perry, Toward a Theory of Human Rights: Religion, Law, Courts (2007); James Griffin, On Human Rights (2008); Nicholas Wolterstorff, Justice: Rights and Wrongs (2008). This essay - a version of which will appear in a multi-authored collection of essays to be published by Oxford University Press in 2009 - is intended as a contribution to human rights theory. These are the principal questions, or sets of questions, I address in the essay: 1. What is the morality of human rights - by which I mean the morality that, according to the International Bill of Human Rights, is the principal warrant for the law of human rights? 2. How does the morality of human rights warrant the law of human rights? 3. Some human-rights-claims are legal claims, but some are moral claims, and some are both. What does a human-rights-claim of the legal sort mean? A human-rights-claim of the moral sort? And when does it make sense to think of a right that only some human beings have - children, for example - as a human right? 4. Is there a plausible secular ground for the morality of human rights? 5. At the end of the proverbial day, what difference does it make - why should we care - if there is no plausible secular ground for the morality of human rights? | |
| | | amena
عضو فعَّـال
عدد الرسائل : 155 العمر : 40 التخصص : علم الأجتماع الدولة : مصر تاريخ التسجيل : 18/09/2009
| موضوع: رد: الموسوعة الكبرى لحقوق الإنسان: أكثر من 100 كتاب ودراسة أجنبية حديثة - تابعونا - 16/3/2010, 9:12 am | |
| | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| | | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Human Welfare, Not Human Rights 17/3/2010, 4:27 pm | |
|
Human Welfare, Not Human Rights Eric A. Posner University of Chicago - Law School March 2008 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 394 U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 207
Abstract: Human rights treaties play an important role in international relations but they lack a foundation in moral philosophy and doubts have been raised about their effectiveness for constraining states. Drawing on ideas from the literature on economic development, this paper argues that international concern should be focused on human welfare rather than on human rights. A focus on welfare has three advantages. First, the proposition that governments should advance the welfare of their populations enjoys broader international and philosophical support than do the various rights that are incorporated in the human rights treaties. Second, the human rights treaties are both too rigid and too vague - they do not allow governments to adopt reasonable policies that advance welfare at the expense of rights, and they do not set forth rules governing how states may trade off rights. A welfare treaty could provide guidance by supplying a maximand along with verifiable measures of compliance. Third, the human rights regime and international development policy work at cross-purposes. Development policy favors the poorest states, while the human rights regime condemns the states with the worst governments: unfortunately, the poorest states usually have the worst governments. Various possible welfare treaties are surveyed. | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Human Rights at the UN: The Political History of Universal Justice 17/3/2010, 4:32 pm | |
|
Human Rights at the UN The Political History of Universal Justice Indiana University Press 2007 528 pages 10,6 mb International human rights law is based primarily on Western values and jurisprudence, but strong challenges from Asia and Africa have stimulated a lively debate over the issue. Thankfully, the current cultural gap has been bridged successfully by the team of Normand (Lahore Univ., Pakistan) and Zaidi (Center for Economic and Social Rights), who have produced an illuminating intellectual fusion. The authors carefully examine the historical background prior to WW II, and then distinguish between group and individual rights in the development of UN principles and covenants. They stress the lack of enforcement mechanisms, but praise the UN for giving birth to the modern human rights regime. Not surprisingly, they blame the Cold War for the evident defects as the US and USSR were both reluctant to accept limitations on sovereignty. The end of the Cold War helped further the UN human rights agenda, but it still remained dependent on voluntary state compliance with soft norms and policy targets. Normand and Zaidi are strongly critical of recent US policy, thus the latter sections of the book are increasingly polemical, but the authors do clearly announce that they are human rights activists, not just scholars. Summing Up: Recommended. | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Mainstreaming Human Rights 17/3/2010, 4:34 pm | |
|
Mainstreaming Human Rights
Christopher McCrudden University of Oxford - Faculty of Law HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE COMMUNITY: RIGHTS AS AGENTS FOR CHANGE, Colin Harvey, ed., Hart, 2004 Abstract: The advent of the Human Rights Act 1998 has significantly increased consideration of how best to ensure the effective delivery of human rights in the United Kingdom. In this paper I examine an additional mechanism, the "mainstreaming" of human rights in governmental decision-making, which may help to address some of the limits of existing approaches to human rights compliance. By "mainstreaming," I mean the reorganization, improvement, development and evaluation of policy processes, so that a human rights perspective is incorporated in all policies at all levels and at all stages, by the actors normally involved in policy-making. My discussion of the issue reaches the conclusion that mainstreaming human rights is a desirable policy but that there is a need for considerably more discussion as to the most effective practical means of achieving this and that some methods that have been suggested might be counter-productive. I attempt to draw out some of the issues that need to be considered in adopting mainstreaming. In particular, the applicability of existing approaches to equality mainstreaming to human rights is examined. | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Human Rights and Reform: Changing the Face of North African Politics 17/3/2010, 4:37 pm | |
|
Human Rights and Reform Changing the Face of North African Politics By Susan E. Waltz University of California Press 1995 303 pages 10.3 mb Independence from colonial rule did not usher in the halcyon days many North Africans had hoped for, as the new governments in Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria soon came to rely on repression to reinforce and maintain power. In response to widespread human rights abuses, individuals across the Maghrib began to form groups in the late 1970s to challenge the political practices and structures in the region, and over time these independent human rights organizations became prominent political actors. The activists behind them are neither saints nor revolutionaries, but political reformers intent on changing political patterns that have impeded democratization.This study, the first systematic comparative analysis of North African politics in more than a decade, explores the ability of society, including Islamist forces, to challenge the powers of states. Locating Maghribi polities within their cultural and historical contexts, Waltz traces state-society relations in the contemporary period. Even as Algeria totters at the brink of civil war and security concerns rise across the region, the human rights groups Susan Waltz examines implicitly challenge the authoritarian basis of political governance. Their efforts have not led to the democratic transition many had hoped, but human rights have become a crucial new element of North African political discourse. | |
| | | د. فرغلى هارون
المدير العـام
عدد الرسائل : 3278 تاريخ التسجيل : 07/05/2008
| موضوع: Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights 17/3/2010, 4:39 pm | |
|
Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights
Christopher McCrudden University of Oxford - Faculty of Law Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 29/2007 COMPARATIVE LAW: A HANDBOOK, Esin ?rücü, David Nelken, eds., pp. 371-398, 2007 Abstract: This paper critically examines recent debates about the appropriate relationship between human rights interpretation and comparative legal methods. These debates have increased significantly in the past decade, and are by no means exhausted. This has occurred in part because of the increased citation by judges of 'foreign' legal materials, in particular judicial opinions, from jurisdictions that have no legal authority in the 'receiving' jurisdiction. Courts are playing an impressive role in the creation of what some see as a 'common law of human rights' or, in the context of Europe, 'a ius commune of human rights'. How human rights interpretation develops by making extensive use of comparative law is an intriguing example of the utilisation of comparative law by courts. Debates about the appropriateness of this have proven useful in illuminating aspects of both comparative law and human rights interpretation. | |
| | | | الموسوعة الكبرى لحقوق الإنسان: أكثر من 100 كتاب ودراسة أجنبية حديثة - تابعونا - | |
|
مواضيع مماثلة | |
|
| صلاحيات هذا المنتدى: | لاتستطيع الرد على المواضيع في هذا المنتدى
| |
| |
| |
|